top-ban03
  1. Home
  2. Stone Crsher Case

Stone Crsher Case

The ground raised is that ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting addition of Rs. 1836804/- on account of claim u/s 80IB ignoring the fact that assessee is a stone crusher and not manufacturer at all, and also in ratio of decision in the case of Lucky Minmat Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT 116 Taxman 1 (SC) and other case …

[email protected]
Contact Us

Are You Looking for A Consultant?